Preview

Андрология и генитальная хирургия

Расширенный поиск

Клиническое значение вариантов строения нижней полой вены и брюшного отдела аорты в хирургии забрюшинного пространства

https://doi.org/10.17650/2070-9781-2014-3-52-61

Об авторах

Светлана Валерьевна Мухтарулина
ФГКУ «Главный военный клинический госпиталь им. акад. Н.Н. Бурденко» Минобороны России
Россия
Москва


А. Д. Каприн
ФГБУ «Московский научно-исследовательский онкологический институт им. П.А. Герцена» Минздрава России
Россия


В. Л. Асташов
ФГКУ «Главный военный клинический госпиталь им. акад. Н.Н. Бурденко» Минобороны России
Россия
Москва


А. Н. Бобин
ФГКУ «Главный военный клинический госпиталь им. акад. Н.Н. Бурденко» Минобороны России
Россия
Москва


И. А. Асеева
ФГКУ «Главный военный клинический госпиталь им. акад. Н.Н. Бурденко» Минобороны России
Россия
Москва


Список литературы

1. Даубер В. Карманный атлас анатомии человека. 5-е изд. СПб.: Изд-во «ДИЛЯ», 2010. 576 с.

2. Benedetti Panici P., Maneschi F., Scambia G. et al. Anatomic abnormalities of the retroperitoneum encountered during aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170(1 Pt 1):111–6.

3. Klemm P., Fröber R., Köhler C., Schneider A. Vascular anomalies in the paraaortic region diagnosed by laparoscopy in patients with gynaecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 2005;96(2):278–82.

4. Kose M.F., Turan T., Karasu Y. et al. Anomalies of major retroperitoneal vascular structure. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2011;21(7):1312–19.

5. Gyimadu A., Salman M.C., Karcaaltincaba M.,Yuce K. Retroperitoneal vascular aberrations increase the risk of vascular injury during lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancers. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;286 (2):449–55.

6. Matsuura T., Morimoto Y., Nose K. et al. Venous abnormalities incidentally accompanied by renal tumors. Urol Int 2004;73(2):163–8.

7. Koc Z., Ulusan S., Oguzkurt L., Tokmak N. Venous variants and anomalies on routine abdominal multi-detector row CT. Eur J Radiol 2007;61(2):267–78.

8. Aljabri B., MacDonald P.S., Satin R. et al. Incidence of major venous and renal anomalies relevant to aortoiliac surgery as demonstrated by computed tomography. Ann Vasc Surg 2001;15(6):615–8.

9. Gupta A., Gupta R., Singhla R.K. Phylogenetic basis of accessory renal artery and its clinical significance. J Clin Diagn Res 2011;5(5):970–3.

10. Banowsky L.N.W. Surgical anatomy. In: Stewart’s operative urology. A.C. Novick, S.B. Streem, J.E. Pontes (eds.). Baltimore: Williams&Wilkins, 1989.

11. Аничков М.Н., Лев И.Д. Клинико-анатомический атлас патологии аорты. Л.: Медицина, 1967. 212 c.

12. Raikos А., Paraskevas G.K., Natsis K. et al. Multiple variations in the branching pattern of the abdominal aorta. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2010;51(3):585–7.

13. Janschek E.C., Rothe A.U., Hölzenbein T.J. et al. Anatomic basis of right renal vein extension for cadaveric kidney transplantation. Urology 2004;63(4):660–4.

14. Nayak B.S. Multiple variations of the right renal vessels. Singapore Med J 2008;49(6):153–5.

15. Lee Y.S., Lee J.H., Choi J.S. et al. Accessory polar renal artery encountered in transperitoneal systemic laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2011;32(1):87–90.

16. Özkan U., Oguzkurt L., Tercan F. et al. Renal artery origins and variations: angiography evaluation of 855 consecutive patients. Diagn Interv Radiol 2006;12(4):183–86.

17. Satyapal K.S., Haffejee A.A., Singh B. et al. Additional renal arteries: incidence and morphometry. Surg Radiol Anat 2001;23(1):33–38.

18. Urban B.A., Ratner L.E., Fishman E.K. Three-dimensional volume-rendered CT angiography of renal arteries and veins: normal anatomy, variants, and clinical applications. Radiographics 2001;21(2):373–86.

19. Hlaing K.P., Das S., Sulaiman I.M. et al. Accessory renal vessels at the upper and lower pole of the kidney: a cadaveric study with clinical implications. Bratisl Lek Listy 2010;111(5):308–10.

20. Skinner D.G., Melamud A., Lieskovsky G. Complications of thoracoabdominal retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J Urol 1982;127(6):1107–10.

21. Jimenez R., Morant F. The importance of venous and renal anomalies for surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. In: Grundmann R. Diagnosis, screening and treatment of abdominal, thoracoabdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms. InTech, 2011. P. 269–92.

22. Karaman B., Koplay M., Ozturk E. et al. Retroaortic left renal vein: multidetector computed tomography angiography findings and its clinical importance. Acta Radiol 2007;48(3):355–60.

23. Shindo S., Kubota K., Kojima A. et al. Anomalies of inferior vena cava and left renal vein: risks in aortic surgery. Ann Vasc Surg 2000;14(4):393–6.

24. Karkos C.D., Bruce I.A., Thomson G.J.L., Lambert M.E. Retroaortic left renal vein and its implications in abdominal aortic surgery. Ann Vasc Surg 2001;15(6):703–8.

25. Kraus G.J., Goerzer H.G. MRangiographic diagnosis of an aberrant retroaortic left renal vein and review of the literature. Clin Imaging 2003;27(2):132–4.

26. Trigaux J.P., Vandroogenbroek S., De Wispelaere J.F. et al. Congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava and left renal vein: evaluation with spiral CT. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998;9(2):339–45.

27. Reed M.D., Friedman A.C., Nealey P. Anomalies of the left renal vein: analysis of 433 CT scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1982;6(6):1124–6.

28. Dilli A., Ayaz U.Y., Kaplanoglu H. et al. Evaluation on the left renal vein variations and inferior vena cava variations by means of helical computed tomography. Clin Imaging 2013;37(3):530–5.

29. Holt P.J., Adshead J.M., Filiadis I., Christmas T.J. Retroperitoneal anomalies in men with testicular germ cell tumours. BJU Int 2007;99(2):344–6.

30. Izumiyama M., Horiguchi M. Two cases of the retroaortic left renal vein and a morphogenetic consideration of the anomalous vein. Kaibogaku Zasshi 1997;72(6):535–43.

31. Koc Z., Ulusan S., Tokmak N. et al. Double retroaortic left renal veins as a possible cause of pelvic congestion syndrome: imaging findings in two patients. Br J Radiol 2006;79(946):e152–5.

32. Ciçekcibaşi A.E., Salbacak A., Seker M. et al. The origin of gonadal arteries in human fetuses: Anatomical variations. Ann Anat 2002;184(3):275–9.

33. Chen H., Emura S., Nagasaki S., Kubo K.Y. Double inferior vena cava with interiliac vein: a case report and literature review. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 2012;88(4):147–51.

34. Benedetti Panici P., Basile S., Angioli R. Pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer: the standardization of surgical procedure and its clinical impact. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113(2):284–90.

35. Lotz P.R., Seeger J.F. Normal variations in iliac venous anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982;138(4):735–8.

36. Edwards E.A. Clinical anatomy of lesser variations of the inferior vena cava; and a proposal for classifying the anomalies of this vessel. Angiology 1951;2(2):85–99.

37. Benedetti Panici P., Scambia G., Baiocchi G. et al. Technique and feasibility of radical para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies: a prospective study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1991;1:133–40.

38. Oktar G.L. Iatrogenic major venous injuries incurred during cancer surgery. Surg Today 2007;37(5):366–9.

39. Rudström H., Bergqvist D., Ogren M., Björck M. Iatrogenic vascular injuries in Sweden. A nationwide study 1987–2005. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008;35(2):131–8.


Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Мухтарулина С.В., Каприн А.Д., Асташов В.Л., Бобин А.Н., Асеева И.А. Клиническое значение вариантов строения нижней полой вены и брюшного отдела аорты в хирургии забрюшинного пространства. Андрология и генитальная хирургия. 2014;15(3):52-61. https://doi.org/10.17650/2070-9781-2014-3-52-61

For citation:


Mukhtarulina S.V., Kaprin A.D., Astashov V.L., Bobin A.N., Aseeva I.A. The clinical implications of variants of vena cava inferior and aorta on retroperitoneal surgery. Andrology and Genital Surgery. 2014;15(3):52-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2070-9781-2014-3-52-61

Просмотров: 1004


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2070-9781 (Print)
ISSN 2412-8902 (Online)